Where Compensation Judgment Gets Tested

Executive compensation is rarely easy, but it feels meaningfully different today. Compensation committees are operating with narrower margins for error amid more frequent and less predictable volatility. Strategic pivots unfold in compressed timeframes. Performance patterns are uneven. Market sentiment changes rapidly. Leadership transitions occur against backdrops that would have seemed implausible a decade ago.

At the same time, scrutiny is expanding beyond pay outcomes and alignment with common financial measures to the broader context. Investors, proxy advisors, employees and regulators are paying closer attention to how credibly boards explain the judgments underlying their decisions, not just mathematical outcomes. In this environment, two issues increasingly appear on committee agendas: how incentives support innovation without diluting accountability and how compensation reflects rapidly evolving risks that are less visible and harder to quantify. READ MORE

Sergey Brin spends $500K to fight tax targeting companies with high-paid executives

Google co-founder Sergey Brin is continuing his foray into California politics with a newly reported donation to a group fighting against a proposed tax in San Francisco that would hit companies with high-paid executives in the tech hub.

A political contribution filing submitted on Wednesday revealed that Brin donated $500,000 to a group that's opposing San Francisco Measure D, which will appear on voters' ballots on June 2. READ MORE

How America’s corporate giants fell out of love with ESG-linked executive pay

Large US-headquartered companies are becoming less explicit about linking executive pay to sustainability goals, Sustainable Views’ analysis of proxy filings reveals.

As businesses rushed to demonstrate their sustainability credentials in the early 2020s, many began making a proportion of executive pay conditional on ESG-related targets or metrics. By 2024, roughly three-quarters of S&P 500 companies embedded some type of environmental, social and governance performance into their executive compensation plans — though approaches have always varied. READ MORE

D.C. Judge Orders Former Nonprofit Executive Director To Pay Back $1M

There are nonprofits out there doing amazing work. The work that they do is largely kept afloat by donations, which are hard to secure when potential donors are worried that their cash will be used for reasons other than what they were told. When donors sent their money to H Street Community Development Corporation, chances are lining the executive director’s pockets weren’t at the top of their to-do list. Unfortunately, former director Kenneth Brewer Sr. decided to give himself several six-figure bonuses over the span of a couple years. The Board, which was not told about his self-administered bumps in pay, sued him for misappropriation of funds back in 2024. After years in court, the money will find its way back to the community it was meant to help. READ MORE

CEOs got millions after boards ‘neutralized’ the impact of tariffs. Some won’t say what it was worth

Christopher Calio, CEO of RTX, collected $27.7 million in compensation last year. That was his total after the $241.5 billion aerospace and defense giant’s board decided the trade war wouldn’t touch his bonus. 

At its January 2025 board meeting, the compensation committee of RTX, formerly Raytheon, pre-authorized the removal of tariff impacts on business metrics related to Calio’s pay months before President Trump announced a set of sweeping Liberation Day tariffs on April 2, 2025 that upended global supply chains. The RTX comp committee said that the tariff-cost impact “should be neutralized” for determining annual bonus payouts because the tariffs were “externally imposed, unpredictable and unrelated to operational execution.” READ MORE

Using global shocks as a laboratory to study executive pay

It is often claimed that executives reap rewards from favourable market tailwinds they did nothing to create. This column uses two decades of Danish data to argue that this ‘pay for luck’ critique requires more nuance. While CEOs do receive higher pay when global conditions are favourable, the authors find that boards reward the effort required to capitalise on those favourable conditions as well as to mitigate losses in the face of negative shocks. The findings suggest that globalisation doesn't just increase pay – it fundamentally changes why and how CEOs are compensated. READ MORE

The Corporate and Billionaire Opponents of San Francisco’s Overpaid Executive Tax

San Francisco voters will soon have a chance to weigh in on a proposed increase to the city’s Overpaid Executive Tax. This proposal would give large corporations with huge gaps between CEO and worker pay a choice between narrowing those gaps to reasonable levels or contributing a bit more to local public services at a time of severe budget shortfalls. Deep-pocketed donors are building a huge war chest to block the initiative. READ MORE

10 high-paying careers where women make up the majority of workers—most pay more than $100,000

While progress toward gender parity remains slow, several career paths offer above-average representation of women as well as high pay, according to a report from Resume Genius published Mar. 3.

Resume Genius, an online career platform and resume builder, identified the top 10 careers with high median salaries and projected job growth in which women make up 50% or more of workers, using data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. READ MORE

DEI-Tied Executive Pay Loses Ground at Companies Amid Backlash

More companies are ditching diversity, equity, and inclusion metrics to help determine their executives’ compensation amid a conservative backlash against corporate DEI programs.

The pullback, however, doesn’t mean the popular tie-in has been abandoned. In fact, a majority of S&P 500 companies and more than 40% of Russell 3000 firms that use environmental, social, and governance metrics in executive pay still link compensation to achieving DEI goals, according to a report the Conference Board, ESGAUGE, and FW Cook released Thursday. READ MORE

Research finds CEOs innovate — or don’t — based on compensation packages and input from analysts


West Virginia University research shows the stock market shapes chief executive officers’ commitments to innovation through mechanisms that range from CEO pay packages to feedback from financial analysts.

“The investment industry usually views financial analysts’ feedback, such as earnings forecasts, as impeding innovation because of the pressure the feedback puts on CEOs,” said Xinchun Wang, associate professor of marketing at the WVU John Chambers College of Business and Economics. “But not all feedback provided by analysts generates that kind of pressure. Stock recommendations actually foster explorative activities like research and development — investments that, although risky, can positively affect long-term returns.” READ MORE

Elon Musk won’t get his $55 billion pay package after all

Elon Musk isn’t going to get that $55 billion pay package after all, a Delaware Chancery Court judge has ruled.

Tesla shareholders approved the package in 2018, which gave Musk incentive to hit specific milestones, including a market valuation of $650 billion, which was more than 10 times the valuation at the time. The trial hinged on a specific question: did Musk mislead the shareholders when he gave them the plan? READ MORE

IBM investors staged 2021 revolt over exec pay

IBM moved to appease shareholders that last year revolted against executive compensation proposals when they contested the massive one-time equity award granted to former Red Hat boss Jim Whitehurst.

Whitehurst, who was made IBM President following Big Blue's $34bn buy of Red Hat, was to be handed a compensation package of more than $27m last year, including $22.4m in stock awards. This upset investors. READ MORE

SEC proposes new rule mandating funds disclose votes on executive pay

The Securities and Exchange Commission voted Wednesday to propose several new rules related to institutional investment funds’ votes on proxy proposals, including whether they support companies’ compensation packages for their top executives.

The Dodd-Frank financial reform law, passed in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, required public companies to hold non-binding shareholder proxy votes on the compensation of their most highly paid executives. It also required companies to disclose so-called “golden parachute” agreements, or compensation arrangements for executives in the event of a merger, acquisition or other transaction. READ MORE